An architecture of diversity for commonsense reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
Although computers excel at certain bounded tasks that are difficult for humans, such as solving integrals, they have difficulty performing commonsense tasks that are easy for humans, such as understanding stories. In this Technical Forum contribution, we discuss commonsense reasoning and what makes it difficult for computers. We contend that commonsense reasoning is too hard a problem to solve using any single artificial intelligence technique. We propose a multilevel architecture consisting of diverse reasoning and representation techniques that collaborate and reflect in order to allow the best techniques to be used for the many situations that arise in commonsense reasoning. We present story understanding—specifically, understanding and answering questions about progressively harder children’s texts—as a task for evaluating and scaling up a commonsense reasoning system.
منابع مشابه
Ethnomethodology and Conversational Analysis
In a speech community, people utilize their communicative competence which they have acquired from their society as part of their distinctive sociolinguistic identity. They negotiate and share meanings, because they have commonsense knowledge about the world, and have universal practical reasoning. Their commonsense knowledge is embodied in their language. Thus, not only does social life depend...
متن کاملA Connectionist Model for Commonsense Reasoning Incorporating Rules and Similarities
1 SUMMARY For the purpose of modeling commonsense reasoning, we investigate connectionist models of rule-based reasoning, and show that while such models can usually carry out reasoning in exactly the same way as symbolic systems, they have more to oer in terms of commonsense reasoning. A connectionist architecture, CONSYDERR, is proposed for capturing certain commonsense reasoning competence, ...
متن کاملA Generic Framework for Approximate Simulation in Commonsense Reasoning Systems
This paper introduces the Slick architecture and outlines how it may be applied to solve the well known Egg-Cracking Problem. In contrast to other solutions to this problem that are based on formal logics, the Slick architecture is based on general-purpose and low-resolution quantitative simulations. On this benchmark problem, the Slick architecture offers greater elaboration tolerance and allo...
متن کاملConnectionist Models of Rule-Based Reasoning
We investigate connectionist models of rule-based reasoning, and show that while such models usually carry out reasoning in exactly the same way as symbolic systems, they have more to ooer in terms of commonsense reasoning. A connection-ist architecture for commonsense reasoning, CON-SYDERR, is proposed to account for common-sense reasoning patterns and to remedy the brit-tleness problem in tra...
متن کاملConcept Hierarchy Memory Model: a Neural Architecture for Conceptual Knowledge Representation, Learning, and Commonsense Reasoning
This article introduces a neural network based cognitive architecture termed Concept Hierarchy Memory Model (CHMM) for conceptual knowledge representation and commonsense reasoning. CHMM is composed of two subnetworks: a Concept Formation Network (CFN), that acquires concepts based on their sensory representations; and a Concept Hierarchy Network (CHN), that encodes hierarchical relationships b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- IBM Systems Journal
دوره 41 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002